Vickipedia

excerpts from the 1888 Chambers’s Encyclopedia of Universal Knowledge

August 31, 2006

LEGION OF HONOR

Filed under: history, society — Erik @ 7:46 am

LEGION OF HONOR, an order of merit instituted under the French Republic in 1802 by the First Consul, as a recompense for military and civil services. It was ostensibly founded for the protection of republican principles and the laws of equality, and for the abolition of differences of rank in society, every social grade being equally eligible; but its real aim doubtless was, by popularizing the idea of personal distinction, to pave the way for the establishment of the Empire and of the more exclusive titles of nobility that were to accompany it. The proposal for its institution was at first violently opposed by the legislative body and the tribunate, on democratic grounds, and carried eventually by a narrow majority.

The order originally comprised three classes�Grand Officers, Commanders, and Legionaries. The class of Grand Officers was, on the coronation of Napoleon I., divided into Knights of the Grand Eagle (the highest class), and Grand Officers. On the restoration of the Bourbons, the Legion was retained, but remodelled so as to lose much of its original character, The eagle was called a cross, and the effigy of Henry IV- replaced that of Napoleon. The Knights of the Grand Eagle became Grand Crosses, the Legionaries were transformed into Knights, and the numerous educational institutions, founded by Napoleon for the children and relatives of the members of the order, were much reduced in scale. In 1837, a new military class called Officers was admitted. Under the Presidentship of Louis Napoleon, part of the property of Louis Philippe, which had been restored to the state, was set apart as an. endowment for the Legion, and new regulations were made regarding the pensions of the different classes. The original form of decoration was reintroduced, which under the second Empire was somewhat modified. As worn then, it consisted of a cross of ten points of white enamel edged with gold ; the points connected with a wreath of laurel proper, and in the center, within an azure circle charged with the words ‘ Napoleon III., Empereur des Francais,’ was a head of the emperor. The cross is ensigned by the imperial crown of France, and worn attached to a red ribbon. The Grand Officers also wore on the right breast a silver star charged with the imperial eagle. The same star was worn on the left breast by the Knights Grand Cross, and their cross was attached to a broad red ribbon which passes over the right shoulder.

The vast numbers of this order, and the insignificance of many of the persons on whom it has been conferred, have detracted much from its value. The number of members in 1872 was 69,179; but the law passed in that year, that only one new member should be added for every two vacancies, reduced the membership in the next five years (1877) to 59,208. The revenue of the College of the Legion has been augmented by the addition of property belonging to Louis Philippe. Out of this fund pensions are paid to those members of the order who have served in the army or navy; the civilian members receive no pension. These pensions amounted in 1877 to the sum of �454,554. By the existing statutes, candidates in time of peace must have served in some military or civil capacity for twenty years; exploits in the field or severe wounds constitute a claim in time of war. Two distributions take place in the year. The nomination of military persons takes place on parade, and of civil in the courts of justice. No ignoble punishment can be inflicted on a member of the order so long as he belongs to it. To rise to a superior rank, it is indispensable, at least for natives of France, to have passed through the inferior grades.

August 30, 2006

FINANCE

Filed under: economics — Erik @ 4:38 am

FINA’NCE, a French word incorporated with our language, means the art of managing money matters, the person who professes this art being called a financier. Finance, in the plural, is often used for money itself, but still with a reference to the purpose to which it is to be applied, as where the finances of a country are said to have improved or fallen off�that is to say, have become abundant or scanty according to the expenditure of the country. Sometimes the word is applied to private wealth, but it is properly applicable to public funds. We use it in this country rather in a political and economic sense than officially, but in France, there have been, from time to time, comptrollers-general of finance, councils of finance, bureaus of finance, &c. Many statesmen have been spoken of as great financiers, from the talent which they have shown for adjusting national revenue and expenditure, as Colbert, Turgot, and Necker in France, and Go-dolphin and Peel in Britain. As a branch of statesmanship, finance is intimately connected with other branches. In questions of national policy�such as, whether a state can go to war or not �the financier is the person who is expected to count the cost, and say how the necessary funds are to be obtained. In the question, whether an unpopular or oppressive tax is to be abolished, the financier is an authority on the question, whether the government can do without it. Hence, there is a special connection between finance and taxation, which has become closer and stronger since the progress of political economy has shown that the taxes which are the most productive, and even the most easily collected, are not always the best, looking at the gain or loss of a nation, in the long-run. Turgot said that finance was the art of plucking the fowl without making it cry. On this notion, the principle of indirect taxation achieved its popularity. For instance, customs duties seem to fall on no one. The importer and the retailer add them to the price of the article, and the ultimate purchaser only knows that the article is dear without experiencing the sense of hardship felt by one who pays out money directly in the shape of a tax. But many indirect taxes have, on the other hand, been found to affect the trade and the wealth of communities to an extent which has made them very deleterious in comparison with direct taxes. See further on matters connected with finance the heads CUSTOMS; DEBT, NATIONAL; CORN LAWS; EXCISE; FREE TRADE; TAXATION; REVENUE.

August 29, 2006

FILLMORE, MILLARD

Filed under: history, biography — Erik @ 8:18 am

FILLMORE, MILLARD, an American statesman, ex-president of the United States, was born on 7th January 1800, at Summer Hill, in the state of New York. Born of English parents, in rather straitened circumstances, all the education he received was the very imperfect instruction furnished by the village school.

At the age of fifteen he was sent to the county of Livingston, there to learn the drapery trade, and soon afterwards was bound apprentice to a wool-carder in his native village.

During the four years he labored at this occupation, he used every means at his disposal to cultivate his mind, devoting his evenings to reading and study. In his nineteenth year he made the acquaintance of a lawyer named Wood, who discovering in the young man talents worthy of a loftier sphere, took an interest in him, and offered him a situation in his office, at the same time supplying him with funds for the prosecution of his studies foe the legal profession. The attention bestowed upon him by his benefactor was not thrown away. He entered with ardor upon the course marked out for him, and in order that he might not be too great a burden upon his friend, devoted a part of his time to conducting a school. He removed to Buffalo in 1821 in order to complete his studies, and in 1823 was admitted a member of the bar. A brilliant career was thus opened up for him, and he delayed not to pursue it. He gradually acquired both means and reputation. In 1829, he began his political career, being in that year chosen as a representative of the county of Erie in the Legislature of New York, where he entered the ranks of the Whig party, at that time in opposition. Here his probity and modesty soon gained him universal esteem. He was mainly instrumental in procuring the abolition of imprisonment for debt in the state of New York. In 1832, F. was elected a member of Congress, and such were the statesman-like qualities displayed by him, that lie was several times re-elected; but in 1844 he resumed his profession of advocate. In 1847, however, he again returned to public life, being elected by a large majority to the post of comptroller of New York; and in the following year he was made vice-president of the United States. The unexpected death of General Taylor in July 1850, leaving the office of president vacant, F. was raised to that high office, which he held till 1853. His presidency was marked by the passing of some very salutary measures, notwithstanding that his party were in the minority. He promoted as far as he could the progress of exploration and discovery, at home and abroad. In 1855, F. visited Europe, and on his return in 1856, he was again nominated for the presidency, but was not returned. F. took no active part in the civil war; though nominally he sided with the Union. After the expiry of his term of office, be retired to Buffalo, where he died in 1874.

August 24, 2006

AMEN

Filed under: religion, language — Erik @ 5:22 am

A’ME’N, a Hebrew word of asservation, is equivalent to ‘Yea,’ ‘ Truly,’ and has been commonly adopted in the forms of Christian worship. In Jewish synagogues, the A. is pronounced by tilt congregation at the conclusion of the benediction given at parting. Among the early Christians, the prayer offered by the presbyter was concluded by the word A., uttered by the congregation, Mention is made of the practice in the 1st Epistle to the Corinthians (xiv. 16). Justin Martyr is the earliest of the fathers who alludes to the use of the response. ‘In speaking of the sacrament he says that, at the close of the benediction and prayer, all the assembly respond “A.” According to Tertullian, none but to faithful were permitted to join in the response.’ A somewhat noisy and irreverent practice prevailed in the celebration of the Lord’s Supper until the 6th c., after which it was discontinued. ‘Upon the reception both of the bread and of the wine, each person uttered a loud ” A.; ” and at the close of the consecration by the priest, all joined in shouting a loud ” A.” ‘ The same custom was observed at baptism, where the sponsors and witnesses responded vehemently. In the Greek Church, the A. was pronounced after the name of each person of the Trinity; and at the close of the baptismal formula, the people responded. At the conclusion Of prayer, it signifies (according to the English Church Catechism) So be it; after the repetition of the Creed, So is it.

August 21, 2006

AMBULANCE

Filed under: medicine, illustrations, military — Erik @ 8:14 am

A’MBULANCE, a military term which is somewhat differently applied in different countries. In France, an A. is a portable hospital, one of which is attached to every division of an army in the field, and provided with all the requisites for the medical succor of sick or wounded troops. Such an A. is stationed at some spot removed from immediate danger; and soldiers are sedulously employed after a battle in seeking out those who have fallen, and conveying them to the A. Baron Larrey, during the great wars of the First Napoleon, brought this department of medical business to a high degree of efficiency, and set an example to the rest of Europe. When England engaged in war with Russia in 1854, the A. arrangements, like many others relating to the army, were in a very imperfect state. In the English army, A., strictly speaking, means a field hospital with all its wagons, litters, tents, cooking canteen, &c-; but sometimes the name is applied to a four-wheeled wagon or a two-wheeled cart fitted up for the reception of wounded men. When Lord Raglan was about to be sent out with the army, Dr. Guthrie, President of the College of Surgeons, devised a new form of A. cart; while Dr. Andrew Smith, Director-general of the Army and Ordnance Medical Department, invented a new A. wagon.


Annexed is a figure of Dr. Guthrie’s A. cart. The badly wounded were laid on it at full length, while those slightly hurt sat in front and rear, and on the sides. A stretcher is slung from the top for the accommodation of the former. The back-board is let down for cases requiring amputation. The hospital chests are lashed underneath. Many of Smith’s A. wagons and of Guthrie’s A. carts were at once made and sent out to the East; but they were not at the proper place when most wanted. After the battle of the Alma, the English were almost entirely destitute of means for conveying their wounded down to the beach; but the French had for this purpose a large number of camlets, suggested to them by their experience in Algeria. Each of these consists of two easy-chairs, slung in panniers across the back of a mule; and it is accordingly available along tracks where no wheel-carriage could pass. These cacolets have since been adopted in the English army, as well as improved, hand-litters, wheeled-litters or barrows, and ambulance wagons on a more modern model than those of Smith and Guthrie, but having the same general character. The American War, the wars of 1866 and 1870, and above all, the growth of volunteer aid societies under the influence of the Geneva Convention of 1866 (which gave to the wounded and their attendants the privileges of neutrality), have largely developed the ambulance equipments of every European army. Every international exhibition now contains an immense number of designs for the safe transport of the wounded. The most remarkable step taken in this direction has been the organization of railway ambulances. Trains of carriages either built for the purpose, or adapted from the ordinary rolling stock, can now be fitted up as moving hospitals, with their staff of surgeons and attendants; and by means of these railway ambulances the wounded can be safely and rapidly removed from the encumbered field hospitals to the permanent hospitals of the great cities of their own country. All the fittings for thus adapting railway trains to hospital purposes are now kept permanently m store in many of the countries of the continent.

August 18, 2006

ARTILLERY

Filed under: military — Erik @ 3:38 am

ARTILLERY sometimes means large cannon or ordnance of every kind; sometimes it includes the shot and shell; sometimes it applies to the soldiers who manage the cannon. In the present work, the large pieces of ordnance, as a class, are described under cannon; specialties are noticed at CARRONADE, HOWITZER, GUN, MORTAR, &c.; and in some cases under the names of the inventors, as ARMSTRONG GUN, LANCASTER GUN, &c. See also FIREARMS, RIFLED ARMS, GUNNERY, SHELLS, SHOT. It may, however, be well here to explain that the term Equipment of A. is applied to a combination of men, material, and horses, suitable for coast-defences, sieges, or the arming of fortified posts. There are several kinds of equipments of light A., under the names of horse, field, rocket, mountain, and reserve; and others of heavy A., for the attack and defence of coasts and fortified places. These various equipments are generally divided into smaller collections called Batteries (q. v.), for more easy control and man�uvring. Paris of A. is a collective name given to the whole of the guns, carriages, ammunition, and other appurtenances essential to the working of field or siege A.

Artillery Corps.�Before the invention of gunpowder, the larger projectile weapons, sometimes called engines of war, sometimes artillery, were worked by rough soldiers, who needed no particular apprenticeship to that art. When, however, large balls of iron came to be propelled by the irresistible force of gunpowder, a great revolution gradually took place, though garrison-guns and siege-guns were improved more rapidly than field-guns. Nevertheless, field-guns changed the whole aspect of military tactics; for it became necessary that an army should form in order of battle at a much greater distance from the enemy than in older times. And when the cannon were made more rapidly movable, so did tactics vary. Gradually, a body of men were set apart to study the force and action of gunpowder, the flight and range of projectiles, the weight and strength of cannon, and the man�uvring of heavy masses. The French were the first to make these researches; after them, the English; and still later, the Germans. During the Thirty Years’ War, an important step was taken in Germany�that of including the artillerymen, who were till then a sort of guild, as a component in the regular army. Gustavus Adolphus’ in Sweden, Frederick II. in Prussia and Napoleon I in France, all attached a very high degree of importance to the A. as an arm of the service. After the great wars in the beginning of the present century, nearly all the states of Europe formally recognized the A. as the third great branch of military service (next after the infantry and cavalry); indeed, in almost all present armies, it takes practically the first place. A. corps, or artillerymen, are divided into land-A. and marine-A. The land-A. is divided into field, coast, garrison, and siege A. The field-A. is sub-divided into horse and foot. There are also the special appellation of reserve, light and heavy A. In most European states, the artillerymen are divided into regiments, battalions, brigades, arid companies; but in Britain the whole form one enormous regiment, which is expanded or contracted according to the exigencies of the service. See below.

When military men speak of the field-A., they usually include cannon, carriages, horses, ammunition, and stores of every description, as well as the artillerymen. The distinction between heavy and light A. depends on the size of the cannon, and the weight of the shot and shell propelled from them. For obvious reasons the construction of very large field-guns is avoided. Military men are not quite agreed as to the precise figures; but there was in the time of Napoleon I. a general concurrence in opinion that a well-appointed field-force should have two or three A. guns to every 1000 infantry, and five or six horse A.-guns to every 1000 cavalry. The proportion is necessarily affected by the kind of country and the amount of available transport. During the Peninsular War, Wellington had seldom more than 1 gun to every 1000 soldiers; when he entered France, he had 3 to the 1000. Napoleon preferred 2 per thousand, with a larger supply of ammunition than had before been deemed necessary; and many foreign governments followed his example. Since the Franco-German war, it is held that there should be always with the army 3 guns per 1000 infantry.

The Royal Regiment of Artillery is the collective name for the whole of the A. belonging to the British army. Under Artillery Corps, the origin of similar bodies on the continent of Europe is briefly noticed. There was no regular regiment or corps of A. soldiers in the English army till the time of Queen Anne, when the present Royal Regiment was formed. Since that period, from some anomaly difficult to explain, all the additions have been made to the same regiment, instead of forming new regiments, to be combined into a division or corps. The regiment is now almost an army in itself; and to increase the anomaly, it comprises horse as well as foot. The foot-A., with medium guns, attend infantry in the battle-field; and with heavier guns, besiege and defend fortified places; while the horse-A., with lighter guns, accompany the cavalry. The mounted artillerymen were organized long after those who man�uvre on foot. Though both corps form one regiment, they have distinct designations�the Royal A., and the Royal Horse-A. Besides these two corps, the regiment is considered to include the Master Gunners and the Coast Brigade.

The regiment has varied from 18,000 to 36,000 strong (including those placed upon the East India establishment), during the last 20 years. Formerly, the foot were divided into battalions, and the horse into troops. Each company, with its quota of guns and stores, constituted a field-battery; and each troop, with its quota, constituted a horse-battery. The terms ‘ company’ and ‘ troop’ are now altogether abandoned as being properly applicable to infantry and cavalry, and both foot and horse are divided into brigades and batteries. Under the old organization, there was no major among the working officers, the designations being captain, second-captain, and lieutenants. The grades now are major, captain, and three lieutenants per battery. A battalion in former times usually comprised eight companies. When the number of the regiment was 18,000,’it comprised 119 companies and troops, averaging somewhat over 150 men each; at other times, the companies varied from 130 to 200 men each. At present, a brigade usually comprises 8 batteries of horse, or 10 of field, or 7 of garrison A. A horse-battery has 5 officers and 151 men; a field-battery (at home), 5 officers and 152 men; and a garrison-battery, 4 officers and from 100 to 150 men, according to the guns of position in its charge. The brigades of foot-A. are designated by ordinal numbers; the brigades of horse-A. are designated by letters, from A to F (omitting E). In the old nomenclature, the companies and battalions of foot-A. had numbers�i.e., 6th company, 12th battalion; and the troops of horse-A. were designated by letters.

The following table, from the Army Estimates of 1832�1883, shows the numbers of the force:

ROYAL ARTILLERY.

Commissioned officers ……………………………………… 1,072

Non-commissioned officers…………………………………. 1,807

Rank and file. ………………………………………………..35,470

&nbsp Horses …………………………………………………………7,576

ROYAL HOUSE-ARTILLERY.

Commissioned officers………………………………………… 181

Non-commissioned officers. …………………………………. 271

Rank and file ………………………………………………… 3,978

&nbsp Horses����………………………………………………….3,344

Total men…………………………………………………….32,779

Total horses …………………………………………………………………… 10,920

Of this number of men 12,065 are placed at the disposal of the East Indies, to be paid for out of Indian revenues. A general order was issued in April, 1882, giving details of the new organization of the Royal A. The former divisions of this regiment which is the largest in the world, numbering some 21,000 men) were 3 brigades of horse, 6 of field, and 5 of garrison A. The new organization provides for 2 horse brigades, 4 field brigades, and 11 divisions of garrison A., in each of which the first brigade consists of regulars, while the Militia Artillery regiments in each district are formed into the junior brigades of their divisions, to each of which a territorial designation is given. The first, or Northern Division, lias its headquarters at Newcastle, arid the Durham, Northumberland, and Yorkshire Artillery are attached to it. The second, or Lancashire Division, includes the Lancashire Militia, and is domiciled at Liverpool. The third, or Eastern Division, hails from Yarmouth, and its second and third brigade are furnished by the Norfolk and Suffolk Artillery Militia. The fourth is the Cinque Ports Division, stationed at Dover, and embracing the Kent and Sussex Militia. The fifth, or Woodwick Division, is formed entirely of regulars, and contains only our brigade. The Southern Division has its depot at Portsmouth, and takes in the Hants and Isle of Wight regiments; and the Western Division at Plymouth takes charge of the Devon and Cornwall regiments. A Scottish and a Welsh Division absorb the militia regiments at each of their districts, their headquarters being at Leith and Pembroke Dock respectively; and the North and South Irish Divisions, with depots at Carrickfergus and Cork, account for the militia of the sister isle. Recruiting for the Royal A. will be carried on by the infantry regimental district officers. See also the articles BATTERY, ARMY ORGANIZATION, and MARINES.

The Honorable Company of Artillery is the oldest volunteer corps in Britain. Four military bodies�the Artillery Company, the Sergeants-at-Arms, the Yeomen of the Guard, and the Gentlemen Pensioners, were established as far back as the time of the Tudors; they all still exist, but under greatly altered circumstances. In 1537, Henry VIII granted a patent creating a guild ultimately known as ‘ The Masters, Rulers, and Commonalty of the Fraternity or Guild of Artillery of Long-bows Cross-bows, and Handguns.’ Its members were empowered to keep arms and to exercise themselves in shooting. In 1638 the corporation of the city of London presented to the Company the plot of ground ever since called the Artillery Grounds, near Moorfields, as a field for military exercise. Royal princes frequently enrolled themselves as members of the Company, usually as ‘ captain-general.’

In 1719, George I. issued an order that all the commission and staff officers of the City Train-bands (a metropolitan militia) should become members of the Company, and exercise with the other members at all convenient times. The word ‘ artillery’ had heretofore been considered as applying to bows and arrows as well as to firearms; but the members of the Company, like oilier marksmen, had almost abandoned archery, without, however, making any change in their designation. The Company, like many other city guilds, has nearly outlived its original purpose, In 1780, when the ‘ Lord George Gordon riots’ afflicted the metropolis, the members of the Company effectually protected the Bank of England; in 1848 and again in 1859, the Company was on the alert to render good service if needed; but it lias never been engaged in actual ‘warfare with an enemy.

The Company consists of members elected by the ballot of a Court of Assistance, consisting of officers and others ex officio, and twenty-four annually elected. The members pay two guineas annual subscription, and �5 entrance fee, and supply themselves with uniforms, but not with arms and accoutrements. These payments, together with the rental received from some real property, constitute the fund out of which the expenses are defrayed. The members learn rifle-shooting as well as artillery practice; there are meetings twice a week at Moorfields; and every summer there are certain days of camping at some country place. The corps comprises six infantry companies, a troop of light cavalry, win furnish their own horses; and a battery of A., as well as a company of veterans. Until 1849, the members elected their own officers; but since that year the crown has appointed them. The lieu ten ant-colonel appoints the non-commissioned officers. The total number of all arms, is about 600. The regiment has of late years taken a. very good position in shooting at Wimbledon. Martini-Henry rifles were lately served out to them, instead of Sniders, a privilege not accorded to the same extent, as yet, other volunteer regiments. The Company is also the only volunteer body allowed to march through the streets with bayou fixed. Compare G. H. Raikes History of the Hon. Artillery Company, 2 vols.

Artillery Schools.�The first school for A. instruction was established by the Venetians in the beginning of the 16th century. Soon afterwards, Charles V. established similar schools at Burgos and in Sicily. The French founded a school of practical A. in 1675; and in 1679, they added to it a theoretical school at Douai. At present, France has no fewer than seven such establishments. Saxony had an A. school in 1766- but the other German state were more tardy in this work. In Prussia, the A. and engineer schools are combined; but in others of the European states, a separation between these two arms of the science is made. Inmost schools of A., the officers’ studies comprise mathematics, as much of physics and chemistry as is necessary to the duties of an artillerist, field and permanent fortification, garrison-warfare, field-tactics, military history and topography, military surveying and sketching, drawing from the model, &c. The practical exercises include the serving and firing of guns and mortars, the laying out and constructing of field-batteries, and the operations of the laboratory and A. workshop.

The headquarters for A. instruction in England are at Woolwich. A Royal Military Academy was established there in 1741, to impart professional instruction to the artillerists and engineers belonging to the royal army. The East India Company sent their A. cadets to this Academy from the year 1798 to 1810; but afterwards, until 1861, they maintained a separate establishment at Addiscombe (which, however, was not wholly for artillery). At the present day, the students in the Academy are recruited by fair open competition. They enter between the ages of seventeen and twenty; and they remain two years, or such longer time as may fit them to pass an examination for the Royal A. or Engineers. The sons of military officers are admitted on lower terms than those of other persons. The financial control is under the Secretary of State for War; but the Commander-in-chief regulates the discipline and internal arrangements. There are 22 professors and instructors of various kinds. Besides this Royal Military Academy, there is at Woolwich a Department of A. Studies, for the instruction of junior officers of A., and for facilitating their visits to the fortifications and public works of foreign countries. There is also a Select Committee, whose duties are not so much educational as experimental; it is a small establishment for examining and reporting on the numerous inventions relating to artillery, brought before the War Office. The School of Gunnery at Shoebury Ness, subordinate to the headquarters of the A. at Woolwich, is for experiments upon ordnance, gunpowder, and projectiles, and to exercise young A. officers in the practical and mechanical duties of their profession. See ARTILLERY in AM. SUPP.

August 16, 2006

PRIVATEER

Filed under: history, military — Erik @ 7:16 am

PRIVATEE’R, a ship owned by a private individual, which, under government permission expressed by a Letter of Marque (q. v.), makes war upon the shipping of a hostile power. To make war upon an enemy without this commission, or upon the shipping of a nation not specified in it, is piracy. Privateering was abolished by mutual agreement among European nations by the Treaty of Paris in 1856. It is doubtful, however, how far that abolition would stand in a general war, for privateering is the natural resource of a nation whose regular navy is too weak to make head against the maritime power of the enemy, especially when the latter offers the temptation of a wealthy commerce.

August 14, 2006

ARTICLES OF WAR

Filed under: law, military — Erik @ 8:43 am

A’RTICLES OF WAR are regulations made for the government of the military and naval forces of the country. They are of three classes�1. Those relating to the army, including therein the forces in India, according to the provisions of the 21 and 22 Vict. c. 106; 2. Those relating to the marine forces; and 3. Those relating to the navy.

1. A. of W. for the Army.�These regulations were formerly issued under the authority of the annual MUTINY ACT (q.v.). By the 68th sect. of the Army Discipline and Regulation Act, 1879, Articles of War can be made by the Queen for the better government of the forces, other than the marines, to whom that Act relates. The Admiralty enjoys like power in the case of marines. The Articles are to be judicially taken notice of by all judges and in all courts whatsoever; provided that no person shall by such A. of W. be subject to be kept in penal servitude, or to suffer any punishment extending to life or limb, except for crimes which the Act declares shall be so punishable. And for the enforcement of such A. of W., a power is given to the Crown to erect, or grant authority to convene, courts-martial to try and punish offences according to the Articles. In order, however, to limit the power conceded to the Crown in this matter, it is enacted that nothing therein contained shall be construed to exempt any officer or soldier from being proceeded against by the ordinary course of law; and that when he is accused of any offence against a subject of the realm, punishable by the laws of the land, he shall be delivered to the civil magistrate. The offences against which these A. of W. are directed, relate to the soldier’s duties and obligations; to crimes and offences and their punishments; to courts-martial; and to rank. The crimes and offences referred to are those against divine worship, perjury, mutiny and insubordination, desertion and absence without leave; offences in the field, camp, garrison, or quarters; drunkenness, disgraceful conduct, false returns, billets and carriages, recruiting and miscellaneous offences. By the third Article it is ordered that every recruit shall, within ninety-six hours, have the 40th and 46th Articles read to him, and shall within ninety-six hours, but not sooner than twenty-four, make the following oath before some qualified authority: ‘I do make oath, That I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty, her heirs arid successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, her heirs and successors, in person, crown, and dignity, against all enemies, and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, her heirs and successors, and of the and officers set over me. So help me God.’ The 191st Article is to the effect, that whenever any forces shall have embarked on board ships of war or transports, the officers and soldiers shall, from the time of embarkation, strictly conform themselves to the laws and regulations established for the government and discipline of the ship; and shall consider themselves, for these purposes, under the command of the senior officer of the particular ship, as well as under the superior officer of the fleet (if any), to which such ship belongs. See A. of W. for the Marine Forces.

2. A. of W. for the Marine Forces, till 1879 made under the authority of another annual Mutiny Act, are now regulated by the Discipline Act. Unlike the A. of W. for the army, they do not issue directly from the Crown, but are made by the Lord High Admiral, or by the commissioners for executing that office, but they are authorized so to be made by the last-mentioned Mutiny Act. With this exception, they are much the same as the A. of W. for the army. They relate exclusively, however, to the marine forces while on shore, and this specialty is expressed in the preamble of the Act, which recites that ‘ the said forces may frequently be quartered, or be on shore, or sent to do duty, or be on board transport-ships, or merchant-ships, or vessels, or they may be under other circumstances in which they will not be subject to laws relating to the government of Her Majesty’s forces by sea.� While doing duty in any of Her Majesty’s ships or vessels in commission, the marines, like other naval forces, are subject to the A. of W. for the government of the navy.

3. A. of W. for the Navy.�In regard to such regulations, the navy is differently situated. It is not governed by any annual Mutiny Act, but the A. of W. relating to it are contained in the Naval Discipline Act, 29 and 30 Vict. c. 109 (1866), which supplies the law of the sea-service. The Naval A. of W. were eminently Draconian, but by the Naval Courts vastly mitigated in practice. The first Naval A. of W. authorized by parliament were contained in the 13 Chas. II. c. 9, said to have been drawn up by Admiral Montague, afterwards Earl of Sandwich, with the approbation of Chancellor Clarendon and other members of the privy council. But the statute and subsequent supplementary Acts were repealed by the 22 Geo. II. c. 33, the forerunner of the later Naval Discipline Act. See Mr. Prendergast’s Law of the Navy, 1852, Part I p. 15.

The Mutiny Act and the Marine Mutiny Act, both now supervised by the above Act of 1879, vested power to make Articles of War in the Crown and Admiralty respectively. These were very voluminous, and often merely a repetition of the clauses of the Mutiny Act, while including others relating to lesser crimes and punishments than there mentioned, as also more details as to the constitution and procedure of courts-martial. The Army Discipline and Regulation Act has so far incorporated the Mutiny Acts and the Articles published with them, that there seems but little necessity for further A. of W. to issue; while rules of procedure, issued by the Crown, under the authority of the Act, and concurred in by the Admiralty, are now published with the Act.

August 8, 2006

AMLETH or HAMLETH

Filed under: history, biography — Erik @ 7:39 pm

AMLETH, or HAMLETH, Prince of Jutland, is said to have lived in the 2d c. B.C. According to Saxo-Grammaticus, he was the son of Horvendill and Gerutha; and after the murder of his father by his uncle Fengo, who married Gerutha, he feigned himself a fool, to save his own life. Saxo relates a number of little things regarding A., which are a curious medley of sharp and lively observation, and apparent madness. We are told that, on one occasion, when he visited his mother, suspecting that he was watched, he commenced to crow like a cock and dance idiotically about the apartment, until he discovered, hidden in a heap of straw, spy, in the person of one of Fengo’s courtiers, whom he immediately stabbed; he then so terrified his mother by his reproaches, that she promised to aid him in his intended revenge on his father’s murderer, and, according to the old chronicler, really did so. Scandinavian traditions confirm the existence of a prince of this name. A field is still pointed out in J�tland with a tomb bearing the name of A. In. the vicinity of Elsinore is shown the spot where the father of A. was assassinated. Saxo himself does not mention the manner or circumstances of his death; but his French translator says that he was murdered at a banquet. Most of the recent historians of Denmark consider the history of A. fabulous, but M�ller thinks there is a substratum of fact in the old myth. It is the source of Shakspeare’s tragedy of Hamlet and thus possesses a perennial interest for all the civilized world.

August 7, 2006

AMANITA

Filed under: biology, illustrations — Erik @ 3:18 pm

AMANI’TA, a genus of Fungi, nearly allied to Agaricus, but bursting from a volva. A. muscaria, which is pretty common in woods, especially of fir and beech, in Britain, is one of the most dangerous fungi. It is sometimes called FLY AGARIC, being used in Sweden and other countries to kill flies and bugs, for which purpose it is steeped in milk. The pileus or cap is of an orange-red color, with white warts, the gills white, and the stem bulbous. It grows to a considerable size. Notwithstanding its very poisonous nature, it is used by the Kamchatkadales to induce intoxication, and it imparts an intoxicating property to the urine of those who swallow it, of which they or others often avail themselves, when abundance of the fungus is not at hand.

August 2, 2006

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS

Filed under: biology, engineering, illustrations — Erik @ 9:46 am

ARTIFI’CIAL LIMBS. With the exception of the celebrated’ artificial hand of the German knight, G�tz von Berlichingen* [* The iron hand of this knight, who has been immortalized by Goethe, it preserved at Jaxthausen, near Heilbronn, and a duplicate of it is in the Schloss Erbach, in the Odenwald. It is stated in Scott’s Harder Antiquities, vol. ii,p. 206, that the family of Clephane of Carslogie ‘have been in possession from time immemorial of a hand made in the exact representation of that of a man, curiously formed of steel,’ which was conferred by one of the kings of Scotland on a laird of Carslogie, who had lost his hand in the service of his country.�See Notes and Queries for July 17, 1867, p. 35.] �who flourished in the early part of the 16th c. (1513), and who was named The Iron-handed � which weighed 3 pounds, was so constructed as to grasp a sword or lance, and was invented by a mechanic of Nuremberg, our knowledge of artificial limbs dates from the time of Ambrose Pare whose (�nures de Chirurgie were published in 1575. The twelfth chapter of that volume, as translated by Thomas Johnson in 1605, shows ‘ by what means arms, legs, and hands may be made by art, and placed instead of the natural arms, legs, and hands that are cut off or lost.

The accompanying figures are copies of his drawing of ‘ an I made artificially of iron (fig. 1),’ and of ‘ the form of an arm made of iron verie artificially (fig. 2).’ He also gives a drawing of ‘a wooden leg made for a poor man’ (fig. 3), which is simply the common wooden leg with bucket receptacle still in use. No improvements worthy of record were made from the time of Abrose Pare to the beginning of the present century, when Baillif of Berlin constructed a hand which did not exceed a pound in weight, and in which the fingers, without the aid of the natural hand, not only exercised the movements of flexion and extension, but could be closed upon and retain light objects, such as a hat and even a pen. ‘Artificial hands,’ says Mr. Heather Bigg, ‘ are now constructed, by means of which a pin may be picked up from the ground, a glass raised to the lips, food carried to the mouth, and a sword drawn from its scabbard, and held with considerable firmness; while a combined arm and hand is fabricated, which is equal to the ordinary requirements of histrionic declamation.’�Orthopraxy, 1865, p. 157. The utility of an artificial arm depends much on the nature of the stump. A stump above the elbow is best suited for an arm when it gradually tapers to its lowest end, and terminates in a rounded surface. When an arm is removed at the shoulder-joint, and there is no stump, an artificial arm can still be fixed in its proper place by means of a corset. In amputation below the elbow joint, the best stump is one which includes about two-thirds of the fore-arm; while a stump formed by amputation at the wrist is very unsatisfactory. The simplest form of artificial arm intended to be attached to a stump terminating above the elbow, ‘ consists of a leathern sheath accurately fitted to the upper part of the stump. The lower end of the sheath is furnished with a wooden block and metal screw-plate, to which can be attached a fork for holding meat, a knife for cutting food, or a hook for carrying a weight.’�Op. cit. .p. 160. The arm should he so carried as to represent the position of the natural arm when at rest. It is retained in its position by shoulder and breast straps, and forms a light, useful, and inexpensive substitute for the lost member. More complicated, and therefore more expensive pieces of apparatus are made, in which motion is given to the fingers, a lateral action of the thumb is obtained, and the wrist-movements are partially imitated; and a degree of natural softness is given to the hand by a covering of gutta-percha and India-rubber. Such a hand, says Mr. Bigg, is often more symmetrical in aspect than the natural hand, but it possesses no efficient grasping power. Hence provision has to be made for attaching various instruments to its palm, such as special hooks, which can be removed at pleasure, for driving, shooting, &c.; apparatus for using the knife and the fork, for grasping the pen, &c.: indeed, the number and variety of instruments capable of being applied to an artificial hand are extremely great. Nothing has tended so much to the very highest development of artificial arms and hands, as an accident which happened more than a quarter of a century ago to the celebrated French tenor, M. Roger, who lost his right arm above the elbow.

It was necessary, for his future appearance on the stage, that he should have an artificial limb, which would serve the purposes of histrionic action, and permit him to grab a sword and draw it from its scabbard. Such a contrivance was invented in 1845 by Van Petersen, a Prussian mechanician, and the French Academy of Sciences commissioned MM. Gambey, Rayer, Valpeau, and Magendie to report upon it. For a history of the nature of the limb, the reader is referred to the report which appeared in the Comptes Rendus for that date, or to Mr. Bigg’s Orthopraxy, pp. 176�181. The apparatus, which weighs less than 18 ounces, was tested upon a soldier who had lost both arms. By its aid he was enabled to pick up a pen, take hold of a leaf of paper, &c.; and the old man’s joy during the experiment was so great, that the Academy presented him with a pair of these arms. Van Petersen’s conceptions have been extended and improved by Messr. Charriere, the celebrated surgical mechanics of Paris, aided by M. Huguier, the well-known surgeon. A very marvelous arm has also been almost simultaneously constructed by M. Bechard, which,’ by means of a single point of traction, placed in pronation, executes first the movement of supination, next in succession the extension of the fingers and abduction of the thumb: the hand is then wide open.’ -Bigg, op. cit. p. 190.

Artificial legs having fewer requirements to perform than artificial arms, are comparatively simple in structure. We borrow the description of our figure of the ordinary bucket leg in common use amongst the poorer classes from Mr. Bigg’s Orthopraxy. ‘ It consists of a hollow sheath or bucket, A. accurately conformed to the shape of the stump, and having�in lieu of the more symmetric proportions of the artificial leg�a ‘ pin,’ B, placed at its lower end to insure connection between it and the ground. This form of leg is strongly to be recommended when expense is an object, as it really fulfils all the conditions excepting external similitude embraced by a better piece of mechanism. It is likewise occasionally employed with benefit by those patients who, from lack of confidence, prefer learning the use of an artificial leg, by first practicing with the commonest substitute.’ As, when the body rests on a single leg, the center of gravity passes through the tuberosity of the ischium, it is essential that the bucket should be so made as to have its sole point of bearing against this part of the pelvis.

Of the more complicated forms of artificial leg three are especially popular. The first of these is of English origin, and owing to its having been adopted by the late Marquis of Anglesea, is known as the Anglesea leg. For a description of it, the reader is referred to Gray’s work on Artificial Limbs, one of the firm of Grays having been the constructor of the legs used by the marquis. This was for a long time the fashionable artificial leg. The second leg worthy of notice is that invented by an American named Palmer, and called the Palmer leg. From its lightness and the greater ease of walking with it, it has long superseded the Anglesea-leg in America. In the third of these legs, also invented in America, and known as Dr. Bly’s leg, the principal faults of the two other legs have been completely overcome. The advantages of this leg are thus summed up by Mr. Bigg, who has fully described and figured its mechanism: (1.) Adaptation to all amputations either above or below the knee. (2.) Rotation and lateral action of the ankle-joint. (3.) Power on the part of the patient to walk with ease on any surface, however irregular, as, owing to the motion of the ankle-joint, the sole of the foot readily accommodates itself to the unevenness of the ground, which is an advantage never before possessed by any artificial limb. (4.) The ankle-joint is rendered perfectly indestructible by ordinary wear, owing to its center being composed of a glass ball resting in a cup of vulcanite; thus it never gets out of repair, as the Anglesea leg but too frequently does, and the original cost is almost the only one the patient incurs. (5.) The action of the ankle-joint is created by five tendons, arranged in accordance with the position assigned to them in a natural leg. These tendons are capable of being rendered tight or loose in a few instants, so that the wearer of the leg has the power of adjusting with precision the exact degree of tension from which he finds the greatest comfort in walking, and also of giving the foot any position most pleasing to the eye. (6.) There is a self-acting spring in the knee-joint, urging the leg forward in walking, and imparting automatic motion, thus avoiding the least trouble to the patient, who finds the leg literally and not metaphorically walk by itself. (7.) The whole is covered by a beautiful flesh-colored enamel, thus avoiding the clumsy appearance of the wood, as is always found in an Anglesea leg, admitting of its being washed with soap and water like the human skin. (8). At the knee-joint there is a mechanical arrangement representing the crucial ligaments, and affording natural action to that articulation by which all shock to the stump in walking is avoided. This leg is patented, and as might be expected, is somewhat expensive.

In cases of arrested development of the lower limbs, short-legged persons may be made of the ordinary height by the use of two artificial feet placed twelve or more inches below the true feet, and attached to the legs by means of metallic rods, jointed at the knee and ankle.

Other parts not entitled to be called limbs, can also be replaced by mechanical art�such as the nose, lips, ears, palate, cheek, and eye. In the present advanced state of plastic surgery, deficiencies of the nose, lips, and palate can usually be remedied by an operation; cases, however, may occur where an artificial organ is required. Artificial ears are molded of silver, painted the natural color, and fixed in their place by a spring over the vertex of the head. Loss of an eye causes sad disfigurement; but the artificial eyes of Boissonneau (see his Renseigements G�n�raux sur les Yeux Artiftciels, leur Adoption et leur Usage), which have been shown in all the recent public exhibitions, completely throw all others in the shade, and cannot be detected without the closest inspection. For further details on all these subjects we must refer to Mr. Bigg’s volume, which is a complete encyclop�dia on these and allied topics.

Powered by WordPress