REAPING
REAPING, the act of cutting corn, has been performed from . time immemorial with an instrument called a reaping-hook or sickle. The sickles in use among the ancient Jews, Egyptians, and Chinese appear to have differed very little in form from those employed in Great Britain. The reaping-hook is a curved instrument of about a foot and a half in length, tapering from a breadth of about two inches at the but-end, where it is fixed into a wooden handle. The edge is sometimes serrated, but, as a rule, it has long been made plain and sharp like a knife. In reaping, the harvester takes the corn in his left hand, and then with the hook cuts the stalks as close to the ground as possible; but when a grass crop has been sown down with the grain, the stubble is often left rather longer, in order to preserve the young grass The corn is placed handful by handful in a band usually made of the corn, and when as much has been cut as will form a sheaf, it is tied up by the ‘ bandster.’ The most expert reapers slash down the corn with the hook in the right hand, using the left merely to keep the corn from falling, until sufficient to make a sheaf has been cut, when the reaper places his hook under the corn, and supporting it with his left arm, deposits it all at once in the band. A bandster (one to every three or four reapers) binds the grain, and sets it up in stocks of generally 12 sheaves. It was surprising to see women of sixty years and upwards, handling the ‘ hook ‘ with great dexterity, accomplishing their 20 and sometimes 24 stocks of 12 sheaves each per day. After such a day’s work, these women appeared much fatigued, but a night’s rest seemed to set them on foot, vigorous as ever. They divested themselves of much of their clothing, and really worked hard for their money.
In the principal corn-growing districts of Scotland, a great proportion of the reaping by hand was at one time done by laborers from Ireland, who undertook the work at from 8s. to 15s. per acre, with board and lodging in addition. Their fare was of the simplest kind—consisting in the majority of cases, of porridge morning and evening, and bread and beer for dinner; their lodging at night was the barn or some outhouse, the farmer providing coarse blankets for covering. The quantity of porridge consumed at each meal by those people was sometimes astonishing—no less, as has been proved by actual weighing, than 5 lbs., with 1 ½ lbs. of milk besides. In England, most of the corn was cut by piecework, at prices varying from 10s. to 18s. per acre. On the stronger lands of the midland and southern counties, the stubble is some-times left knee-high, and afterwards at leisure cut by the scythe, or with a long hook, at a cost of 2s. per acre. In Yorkshire, Derbyshire, Oxfordshire, and on many of the lighter soils in other counties, the operation of fagging or hacking, to be afterwards noticed, was preferred as being more expeditious than reaping. A good hand cut down from one-third to one-half of an acre of wheat, and often consumed, during his long day’s labor, two gallons of good ale.
The scythe in some counties, more than thirty years ago, was preferred to the sickle. The most common varieties were: the Hainault scythe—an importation from Belgium—the cradle scythe, and the common scythe fitted with a cradle. The Hainault scythe consists of a blade about 2 feet 3 inches long, having a handle 14 inches long. This the mower holds in his right hand, while in his left he carries a hook, with a handle of about equal length. ‘The reaping,’ says the late Mr. Henry Stephens, in his Book of the Farm, ‘is done by pressing the back of the hook with the left hand against the standing corn, in the direction of the wind, and by cutting with the scythe close to the ground against the standing corn with a free swing of the right arm,’ the hook keeping the cut corn from falling until a sufficient quantity to form a sheaf has been cut. This operation was practised in many parts of England, and especially on the lighter soils, under the name of fagging or hacking, the reaper sometimes using in his left band. instead of the hook, a stout crooked stick from 2 1/2 to 3 feet long. Beans and oats were the crops most generally fagged.
The cradle scythe is composed of a blade about 3 1/2 feet long, attached to a principal helve or sned about 4 feet long, into which another helve of about 2 1/2 feet in length is tenoned, thus making two handles. The cradle or bow is a piece of wood joined to the heel of the blade, into which are inserted three or four wooden teeth, in a line with the blade, the object of which is to secure the grain being laid evenly in one direction. As skill at the working of the scythe, however, increased, the cradle or bow was discarded in many cases. By the scythe, corn can be cut at a rather less cost per acre than with the hook; but the work is not so neatly done. As nice a stubble will be left by a good hand with the scythe, and often nicer than by the hook, but the sheaves are not, as a rule, so tidy after the scythe, though they will stack rather earlier. Of a fair working crop, an adept at the scythe would cut 2 or 2 1/4 acres per diem. The average area cut per day with the scythe does not exceed 1 1/2 acres. In fact, if the crop is heavy, that extent is a very hard day’s work. Those who contract for cutting the crops by the scythe, obtain the services of the best men, and thus generally get about 2 acres per day reaped, and reaped very well too. In the midland and southern counties, of England, the scythe, long in general use, was of larger size, and had only one long shaft, on which were fixed two handles. In Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, and some of the eastern counties, the whole of the cutting, until the introduction of reaping-machines, was done by these scythes. The harvest operations then, from the cutting of the crop to the thatching of the ricks, cost from 18s. to 25s. per acre.
The process of reaping with either the sickle or the scythe is, however, both tedious and expensive; and hence, during the last three-quarters of a century, many attempts have been made to accomplish the work by machinery—attempts which, in the course of the last twenty years, have been crowned with complete success ‘ Reaping by machinery, however, is no modern invention. Pliny the elder, who was born in the 1st c. of the Christian era, found a reaping-machine in Gaul. He says : ‘ In the extensive fields in the lowlands of Gaul, vans of large size, with projecting teeth on the edge, are driven on two wheels through the standing corn by an ox yoked in a reverse position. In this manner the ears are torn off, and fall into the van.’ Palladius, about four centuries later, found a similar appliance for reaping corn in Gaul. He gives a more detailed but similar description of the machine. The annexed cut, copied from Mr. Woodcroft’s Appendix to the Specifications of English Patents for Reaping-machines, represents what is conceived, from the descriptions, to have been the form of this ancient reaper.
In modern times, the idea of a mechanical reaper appears to have originated with a Mr. Capel Lloft, who, in 1785, suggested a machine something after the pattern of the ancient one above described. Between that time and the Great Exhibition of 1851, in London, from which the general use of mechanical reapers may be said to date, the patents taken out for reaping-machines were very numerous. Among the most promising of these may be mentioned those of Mr. Gladstone of Castle-Douglas; Mr. Smith of Deanston; Mr. Kerr, Edinburgh; Mr. Scott of Ormiston; Mr. Dobbs, an actor in Birmingham; Mr. Mann of Raby, near Wigton; and the late Rev. Patrick Bell of Carmylie, Scotland. In 1826, Mr. Bell constructed an efficient and simple machine, which long continued in use, and several features of which are observable in the reapers of the present day. The inventor of this, the first machine of the kind in Scotland, received a public testimonial from agriculturists, in consideration of the services he thus rendered to agriculture. In America Mr. Hussey and Mr. M’Cormick took out patents for reaping-machines of superior character in 1833 and 1834 respectively.
The movements of the cutters of these machines were various. A few were advancing only, some sidelong and advancing, others reciprocating and advancing, a large number continuous and advancing, and others continuous and alternate. The reciprocating and advancing motion is that now employed on the machines in use. The principal difference in the machines now so largely used for cutting corn is in the form and character of the cutters, and in the mode of delivering the grain after it is cut.
The cutting-knives are of two kinds—one, obtuse-angled and serrated; the other, acute-angled and for the most part plain. Both are attached to a bar, and are made to-work through another bar of iron fitted with hollow fingers, called guard-fingers, which, projecting forwards, catch the standing corn, and retain it firmly until it is cut. The serrated knife saws through it; the plain knife clips it, as it were; the finger-guard forming the fixed blade of the scissors.
The delivery of the sheaves is effected either by manual or mechanical labor; but the vast proportion of the machines in use are what are termed manual delivery-reapers. The delivery of the sheaves by manual labor is now almost at the back of the machine, the side delivery being generally abandoned, unless in the self-deliveries. In delivering the grain, a man, with a short-handled rake in his hand, sits upon the machine almost opposite the cutting apparatus. With this he inclines the grain towards the knife; and when sufficient to make a sheave has been cut, he rakes it off the platform upon the machine, on to which it has fallen, and deposits it on the ground. The cut subjoined will illustrate the method of raking off. In making a neat and squarely-formed sheaf, the raker is greatly assisted by a hinge in the platform, which enables him, by pressure of the foot, to tip the board over, so as to let the corn slide gently down.
With the back-delivery, the sheaves must be tied up and removed out of the way of the machine before it comes round again. Such a reaper, therefore, always requires a full supply of hands to attend upon it. But it is the best for all that. It does require a skilful, careful man to ‘ tilt,’ but the fact that the course has to be kept clear for the horses every round, spurs the laborers, who thus do more work than they would otherwise accomplish. Besides, it is a very doubtful advantage to be enabled to slash down the crops irrespective of the gathering capacities. Moreover, with the self-deliveries, it is the distance gone over, and not the quantity of crops collected, that regulates the size of the sheaf. With uneven crops, this is an inconvenience. Sheaves of different sizes are very troublesome in the stock. They will not stand well, and in stacking it is difficult to keep uniformity in building. Large and small sized sheaves are not equally dried, and are not ready for stacking at the same time. Eight people ‘ lifting’ after the manual-reaper will do as much work as nine following the self-delivery, so that the saving of a man’s labor claimed by the self-delivery is doubtful. The sheaves are rather better formed by the manual machine than by the self-delivery. Each kind, has, however, and will likely continue to have its advocates, though the preponderance is in favor of the manual.
The mechanical or self-delivery machines, as they are generally called, are of two kinds—one lays the cut corn in swaths, the other deposits it in sheaves. The latter is decidedly the best and most fashionable of the two.
The automaton sheaf-deliverers best known to the public are those of Samuelson of Banbury; Hornsby and Son; Burgess and Key; Brigham and Bickerton, Berwick; Howard and Co., Bedford. We give a description of Samuelson’s sheaf-deliverer (largely used in Great Britain), which will be made plain by the accompanying cut. The self-delivering machinery consists of a series of four rakes—two toothed, and two plain—attached to an upright shaft, in such manner as to admit of a free ascending, descending, and horizontal motion. The two toothless rakes, or ‘ dummies,’ are shorter in the arms by six inches than the other two, and are merely employed to incline the grain towards the cutter. The platform upon which the grain fails after it is cut is of quadrant shape, and is surrounded, on the outer edge, by a rim of about a foot deep. The side of the earn next the platform is bent or depressed, so that the rakes on reaching this point, make a sudden fall, or eccentric motion, thus assuming the horizontal attitude necessary to sweep over the platform on the level. The rakes are adjusted so as to lay the sheaves about 12 feet apart, to the side, and out of the way of the horses. This machine has a, double-throw knife—an arrangement which reduces the driving speed, and consequently the wear and tear of the machinery.
In M’Cormick’s automatic delivery-machine, a rake is so used that ‘during one part of the revolution of the gathering-reel, it acts as one of the vanes of the reel in bending the standing corn to the cutting-blades. When the rake reaches the cutting-blades in front of the platform, it ceases to revolve around the reel-shaft (which continues its rotary motion), and is made to move horizontally upon a vertical hinge, to which one end is attached (the points of the teeth being near the surface of the platform), sweeping the cut corn off at the side, and depositing it on the ground in sheaves ready for the binder.’ The Messrs. Brigham and Bickerton’s improved machine has a deep upright board of sheet-iron to keep the corn on the platform. Iron rods on these sheets separate the corn. This firm has thrown off two branches lately. The first offshoot was Messrs. Lillie and Elder, and the last was Bickerton and Co. The three firms make good serviceable reapers. Howard and Hornsby’s reapers are substantially and simply constructed, embracing slight improvements every other year, formed on experience. Prices range from £20 to £35.
The makers of manual delivery-machines are numerous, including in a prominent degree Kemp, Murray, and Nicholson, Stirling; Jack and Sons, Maybole; Harrison, Macgregor, & Co.; Picksley, Sims & Co.; Ransome, Sims and Head, Ipswich; Sam-nelson & Co., Banbury; J. and F. Howard, Bedford; and many others of fame. The manual delivery-machines of the first named firm are very popular, strong and ingeniously manufactured, while those of the Maybole firm are not quite so strong, but work with great ease and tastefulness. Carefully handled, the manual delivery-reaper will take up laid and twisted crops admirably. Indeed, all the reapers nowadays, perfected as they are year by year, now do their work remarkably well, leaving a beautiful stubble and a nice sheaf. The sheaves from the reaper, however, are not so easily dried for the stackyard as those from the scythe, but they defend rain better, and are altogether preferable. The number of reapers now in use in Great Britain is enormous, and is growing rapidly every year. They are a most decided improvement. Indeed, they are one of the most valuable introductions that have been made in rural agriculture in this country. At almost every farm of ordinary or even comparatively small dimensions, there is a reaper, and three or four engaged on the larger holdings. The cost of the manual delivery ranges from £18 to £30.
The cost of reaping by machinery is much less than either by scythe or sickle. Mr. Wilson of Woodhorn, Morpeth, found that the cutting of wheat with the sickle (binding and stocking included) cost him from 11s. to 15s. per acre, and with the scythe 8s., whilst with the machine it only cost him 5s. 9d., exclusive of wear and tear. From data supplied by a large number of their customers, Messrs. Samuelson & Co. make out that the saving by mechanical over hand labor is, as compared with reaping, 4s. per 1 acre, and with mowing, Is. 9d. per acre; and most farmers who have tried reaping-machines set down the saving at from 20 to 30 per cent. Besides, there is about a like economy in time, which is of immense importance in a variable climate like that of Great Britain.—See Woodcroft’s Appendix to Patents for Reaping-machines; Mr. Jacob Wilson’s ‘ Essay on Reaping-machines,’ in Transactions of Highland Society for January 1864; Book of Farm Implements, and Book of the Farm, by Henry Stephens; J. C. Morton’s Cyclopaedia of Agriculture.